Is the Intel Arc A770 better than the RTX 3060?

In modern DX12 and Vulkan games, yesu2014Arc A770 generally delivers up to ~10% better FPS at 1440p and offers higher VRAM and bandwidth. However, for older DX11/DX9 games, the RTX 3060 provides more consistent performance and stability.

Does the Arc A770 support AV1 encoding?

Yesu2014Arc A770 includes hardware AV1 encode and decode, which is highly valuable for streamers and content creators. RTX 3060 does not offer AV1 encoding.

Which card uses less power and runs cooler?

The RTX 3060 is notably more power-efficientu2014Tech4Gamers measured it runs ~20% cooler and consumes ~20% less power than the Arc A770.

Is driver support for Arc A770 reliable?

Drivers have improved but still lag behind Nvidiau2019s maturity. Arc performs well in newer APIs, but older games may still suffer from glitches or poor performance without frequent updates.

Should I go for DLSS or XeSS?

RTX 3060 benefits from mature DLSS support across many games. XeSS on Arc is improving but has more limited game compatibility.

Is the extra VRAM on Arc beneficial?

Yesu201416u202fGB VRAM on Arc A770 helps in 1440p and high-resolution textures, providing future-proofing compared to the 12u202fGB on RTX 3060.

Which GPU offers better value?

It dependsu2014Benchmarks suggest RTX 3060 offers better legacy performance per dollar. But if you use AV1 or play modern titles, Arcu2019s advantages may justify its cost.

Is Arc A770 reliable for content creation workflows?

If AV1 encoding is critical, yes. But in Unreal Engine and other RT-heavy workflows, Arc equals or underperforms RTX 3060. Consider RTX for more stable performance in such tools.

Intel Arc A770 vs RTX 3060: Full Comparison and Verdict

Intel Arc A770 vs RTX 3060: Which GPU Should You Choose?

Here’s the verdict up front: the Intel Arc A770 generally delivers equal or better rasterized performance than the RTX 3060—especially at 1440p—but offers less consistent results in older DX11 titles. Its strengths lie in newer API games, AV1 encoding, and VRAM volume. The RTX 3060 wins on driver maturity, power efficiency, and stability.

This post may contain affiliate/partner links. If you buy or sign up through them, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

What are the key specifications?

Intel Arc A770 is a desktop GPU based on Xe HPG architecture. It features 32 Xe‑cores (4096 shaders), 32 ray tracing units, 512 matrix (AI) engines, 16GB GDDR6 on a 256‑bit bus, ~560 GB/s bandwidth, and 225 W TDP.([intel.com](https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/sku/229151/intel-arc-a770-graphics-16gb/specifications.html))

The GeForce RTX 3060 is based on Ampere architecture with 3584 CUDA cores, 12 GB GDDR6 on a 192‑bit bus (~360 GB/s), and a lower TDP around 170 W (approximate).([videocardbenchmark.net](https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/compare/4605vs4345/Intel-Arc-A770-vs-GeForce-RTX-3060))

fce gpus intel arc a770 vs rtx 3060 fig2 1788429656

Spec	Arc A770 (16 GB)	RTX 3060 (12 GB)
Shaders/Xe‑cores	4096	3584
Ray Tracing Units	32	N/A (RT cores)
Memory	16 GB GDDR6 @ 560 GB/s	12 GB GDDR6 @ ~360 GB/s
TDP	225 W	≈170 W

How do they perform in games?

In modern DirectX 12/Vulkan titles, Arc A770 often outperforms RTX 3060—by ~10% on average across diverse games at 1440p. Tech4Gamers reports average FPS of 68.4 vs 62.2, respectively, ~10.6% improvement.([tech4gamers.com](https://tech4gamers.com/arc-a770-vs-rtx-3060/))

TechSpot also found A770 “crushed the RTX 3060” at 1080p (~14% faster), and held leads in several DX12 games.([techspot.com](https://www.techspot.com/review/2542-intel-arc-a770-a750/?utm_source=openai)) Unreal Engine benchmarks show that A770 is roughly on‑par with RTX 3060 in raster performance but lags slightly in ray tracing.([pugetsystems.com](https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/intel-arc-a770-and-a750-content-creation-review-sept-2023-update))

But in older DX11 or unsupported titles, RTX 3060 remains significantly more consistent. PCWorld notes Arc suffers in DX11 games, and performance can be erratic without Resizable BAR or up‑to‑date drivers.([pcworld.com](https://www.pcworld.com/article/1361825/nvidia-geforce-rtx-3060-vs-intel-arc-a770.html)) PassMark data confirms Arc underperforms in DX9/DX10 significantly.([videocardbenchmark.net](https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/compare/4605vs4345/Intel-Arc-A770-vs-GeForce-RTX-3060))

Gaming performance summary

Newer DX12/Vulkan titles: Arc A770 often leads (≈10% avg FPS gain).
Older games (DX11/DX9): RTX 3060 provides more stable and often better performance.
Resolution scaling: A770 scales better to 1440p due to higher VRAM and bandwidth.([techradar.com](https://www.techradar.com/computing/gpu/intel-arc-a770))
Ray tracing: RTX 3060 + DLSS more mature; XeSS support is limited.([pcworld.com](https://www.pcworld.com/article/1361825/nvidia-geforce-rtx-3060-vs-intel-arc-a770.html))

AV1 Encoding and Content Creation

fce gpus intel arc a770 vs rtx 3060 fig1 1788429631

The Arc A770 includes hardware AV1 encode/decode—a significant advantage for modern streamers and creators. RTX 3060 lacks AV1 encoding. PCWorld highlights Arc as one of best options for AV1 streaming.([pcworld.com](https://www.pcworld.com/article/1361825/nvidia-geforce-rtx-3060-vs-intel-arc-a770.html))

For Unreal Engine development, Arc is generally on par with RTX 3060 but trails in ray‑traced scenes, making it less ideal for heavy content‑creation workflows.([pugetsystems.com](https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/intel-arc-a770-and-a750-content-creation-review-sept-2023-update/))

Power, Thermals, and Efficiency

Tech4Gamers measured Arc A770 running 21% hotter and consuming ~20% more power than RTX 3060.([tech4gamers.com](https://tech4gamers.com/arc-a770-vs-rtx-3060/)) RTX 3060 remains more efficient on thermals and energy.

Driver Maturity and Stability

Arc GPU drivers have improved but still lag behind Nvidia’s in legacy DX11 support and stability. PCWorld emphasizes RTX 3060’s consistent experience across diverse titles.([pcworld.com](https://www.pcworld.com/article/1361825/nvidia-geforce-rtx-3060-vs-intel-arc-a770.html)) Community feedback echoes this: Arc excels in newer games but falters in older titles or without driver updates.([reddit.com](https://www.reddit.com/r/IntelArc/comments/14n5unx))

Price and Value

PassMark’s G3DMark indicates RTX 3060 (bin ~$400) scores 16,708 vs Arc A770 (~$359) at 13,348. The 3060 offers better value per dollar on raw legacy synthetic benchmarks.([videocardbenchmark.net](https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/compare/4605vs4345/Intel-Arc-A770-vs-GeForce-RTX-3060))

When should you choose one over the other?

Choose Arc A770 if you:

Play modern DX12/Vulkan games and want extra VRAM and bandwidth.
Use AV1 hardware encoding (streaming, video production).
Have a system with Resizable BAR and newest drivers for full performance.

Choose RTX 3060 if you:

Play many older or DX11 titles.
Need reliable, consistent performance and mature drivers.
Prefer lower thermals and power draw.
Use DLSS and wider ray tracing support in currently published titles.

Detailed Feature and Trade‑off Comparison

Aspect	Arc A770	RTX 3060
Modern Game Performance	Often ~10% faster	Consistent, slightly behind
Legacy/DX11 Games	Unstable, weaker	Very reliable
Ray Tracing & Upscaling	Good RT, XeSS limited	Better RT + mature DLSS
Encoding	AV1 support	No AV1
Power/Thermals	Higher TDP, hotter	More efficient
VRAM & Bandwidth	16 GB / ~560 GB/s	12 GB / ~360 GB/s
Drivers	Improving, still hit‑or‑miss	Proven stability

Intel Arc A770 vs RTX 3060: Full Comparison and Verdict